There are revealed the peculiarities of microtoponyms in the process of world-view formation different from other nations world-views. Microtoponyms that reflect practical activities of people from some particular region are shown as the components of the national linguistic world picture.

The objects of the analysis are microtoponyms from Ural and Altaic, Altaic, Finno-Ugric, Iranian, Turkic, Mongolian, Arabic and Persian and Russian languages. There is emphasized that the Tatar onomastics consisting of ethnolinguistic strata in aggregate form an integrated linguistic world picture.